Compliance Saves Lives







Screening Saves Lives

Hemoccult® products are the only FOBTs proven through large-scale, randomized clinical trials to reduce both the incidence of colorectal cancer and its mortality.

E.A.S.Y Cancer Screening with Hemoccult ICT

Hemoccult ICT Product Information

Download Hemoccult ICT Sales Tools

Physicians' #1 Choice in Fecal Occult Blood Tests
 

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still the second leading cancer killer in the US, affecting both men and women equally. But by using Hemoccult annual screening tests, the risk of death from CRC can be reduced by up to 33%.1 Hemoccult products are the only FOBTs proven through large-scale, randomized clinical studies to reduce both CRC incidence and mortality.


Used with confidence by physicians for over 30 years, Hemoccult products are supported in over 300 clinical publications and are recommended by the American Cancer Society as an effective screening method. Our annual triple-slide, take-home FOBT is the least invasive colorectal cancer screening method available and can be prepared by the patients in the privacy of their own home. With fewer diet restrictions than other FOBT products, Hemoccult is easier for the patient to complete.
   

Hemoccult Products
 

Most clinically proven and widely used FOBT. Trusted for over 30 years.
   

Hemoccult ICT
 

This latest addition to the Hemoccult product family, Hemoccult ICT, is the most advanced FOBT offered by Hemoccult. Superior specificity and sensitivity make it an ideal screening tool for colorectal cancer. It requires no diet or drug restrictions on the part of patients.

Click here for information on the Hemoccult ICT Advantage.
   

Hemoccult SENSA® Products
 


The enhanced Hemoccult product that provides increased clinical sensitivity and improved readability.

   

Hemoccult II® SENSA elite
 

Designed to increase patient compliance by offering easier patient instructions, easier sampling, and offering the healthcare provider easier test processing.
   

Footnotes:

1. Mandel JS et al. NEJM 1993;328:1365-1371.